Request material certifications & technical data sheets — available same day. Get Documentation →

I Almost Chose the Wrong Elevator Contractor: A $400 Lesson in Hidden Costs

When I started managing the elevator maintenance budget for a 200-person office building, I knew one thing for sure: I didn't want to overpay. Coming from a background in industrial procurement, I'd seen too many contracts where the flashy logo and lowest quote hid a minefield of add-ons. So when our existing contract was up for renewal in Q2 2024, I decided to do a thorough comparison.

I reached out to five vendors. Three responded seriously. One of them was thyssenkrupp. Another was a well-known competitor, and the third was a smaller local outfit. My boss, bless his heart, just wanted the cheapest number on a spreadsheet. But I'd been burned before—literally, by a vendor who charged extra for 'emergency callouts' that were part of the standard scope elsewhere.

The Temptation of the Low Bid

The local company's quote was about $4,200 annually. The competitor was $4,800. thyssenkrupp came in at $5,100. On paper, the choice was obvious: go with the local guy, save almost a thousand bucks a year. I almost signed it. Almost.

But I knew better. I'd learned the hard way that the cheapest quote is rarely the cheapest total cost. So I dug into the fine print. It wasn't fun. Each contract used different language for the same things, which made comparing apples to oranges feel like comparing apples to lawnmowers.

What I Missed the First Time

I knew I should have asked for a detailed breakdown of all potential fees upfront, but I thought 'what are the odds?' Well, the odds caught up with me when I found the local's contract had a clause about 'additional labor for after-hours service.' The competitor had a separate line item for 'remote monitoring activation.' And thyssenkrupp? Their quote was all-inclusive. No surprises.

I compared costs across three vendors. Vendor A (the local) quoted $4,200. Vendor B (the competitor) quoted $4,800. I almost went with Vendor A until I calculated the Total Cost of Ownership: Vendor A charged $450 for after-hours service, $200 for emergency callouts, $150 for remote monitoring setup. Total: $4,200 + $800 in potential extras if something went wrong—which it usually does. Vendor B's $4,800 included monitoring but charged $300 for emergency callouts and $250 for software updates. thyssenkrupp's $5,100 covered everything I could imagine: routine maintenance, all parts, after-hours service, unlimited callouts, remote monitoring, and software patches. The difference? A hidden 17% in unexpected fees.

The Story That Made Me Change My Approach

Then I remembered a disaster from three years earlier. We'd bought a used ticket printer for our lobby display (stupid, I know). The 'cheap' option was $400 less than the refurbished unit from thyssenkrupp's recommended partner. It broke in six months. The repair cost $1,200. The total was $1,600 for what should have been a $1,000 solution. I still kick myself for that one. If I'd applied a TCO framework then, I'd have saved $1,200 and weeks of hassle.

The surprise wasn't the price difference between the three quotes. It was how much hidden value came with thyssenkrupp's 'expensive' option—support, revisions, quality guarantees, and no nickel-and-diming on service calls. Never expected the $5,100 quote to be the least risky bet.

What I Do Now (and What You Should Do)

Since that review, I've created a simple checklist for evaluating any maintenance or installation contract:

  • Ask for a full fee schedule. If they don't provide one upfront, that's a red flag.
  • Calculate TCO over three to five years. Factor in potential callouts, parts replacements, and software upgrades.
  • Check for automatic renewal clauses. Some contracts automatically renew at a higher rate unless you give 90 days' notice.
  • Talk to current customers. I called two buildings using thyssenkrupp's service. One had been a customer for eight years. They said the same thing: 'We never think about the elevator—it just works.'

I ended up going with thyssenkrupp. Over six years, we've spent about $30,600. I estimate we've saved at least $4,000 in avoided emergency fees and upgrade costs compared to what we'd have paid with the local vendor. Not bad for a decision that looked like 'overpaying' on paper.

We didn't have a formal TCO approval process before that decision. The third time I saw a hidden fee slip through—when a vendor charged us for 'software licensing' that was supposed to be included—I finally created a verification checklist. Should have done it after the first time.

Jane Smith
Jane Smith

I’m Jane Smith, a senior content writer with over 15 years of experience in the packaging and printing industry. I specialize in writing about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in packaging design, sustainability, and printing techniques. My goal is to help businesses understand complex printing processes and design solutions that enhance both product packaging and brand visibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *